Some ironic observations surrounding the current mix of nominees…

A liberal black man runs for office with nearly no political background that is substantial enough to brag about. He runs on the premise of bringing “change” to Washington, then picks as his VP an “in-the-trench” lifetime, white, old boy network Senator (Biden) as his running mate.

McCain, with 20+ years experience in the Government appoints instead a female Governor with no ties to Washington, and relatively little experience.

Ironic that the nominee from the left picks a predictable establishment white man to represent his “change” and McCain picks a “minority”(politically, at least) who can act with freedom from lobbyists.

The left rants that Palin has no experience, or limited… too little, they say, to have her a heartbeat away from the White House. But wait a minute… they don’t apply that same logic to the man they want to put IN the White House. So in their minds, our VP pick doesn’t have enough experience to be President, but their pick FOR President? Well, he just oozes experience, right?

The Race/Woman Factor

This one is one of the most agonizingly painful abuses of logic I have heard or seen in some time. Ask any left/liberal partisan what they think about the suggestion that Hillary supporters that would be more “centrist” might flock to the McCain ticket because Governor Palin is a woman, and you will hear the following (I did)… “That is disturbing, offensive and degrading to suggest that women are so stupid or simple that they would just vote en masse for one of their own kind simply because she is one of their own kind…”

Here’s a note to you lefties- Obama’s support from blacks is 92%. Is it disturbing, offensive, and degrading to blacks (or even disturbing to the REST of us?) that they are voting in this manner for one of “their own” apparently because he is, simply, one of “them”?

I’ll let you all decide…

ShareThis