Comments on: The Bush Legacy

By: Terence Smelser

Terence Smelser — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:24:24 +0000

Well done Con.

A small point about WMDs, no we did not find any, that brings up a question. Where the hell are they?
We KNOW he had them, we’ve seen the pictures of the murdered Kurds, women, childern, dogs and cats.

And some wonder why the rest of us wanted that freak dead…

He used them in his little battle with Iran, (he didn’t use enough of them there in my mind)
Point is, we know he had them, we’ve seen the pictures and the films.
So where the hell are they?

According to a count I read somewhere (Official) there are still around 800 of them unaccounted for based on records found in Iraq and those of the UN pansys “looking” for them. Would it not be just farging GREAT if the boys with the diapers on their heads have them, or FIND them?
I’ve never held W to task on this on, the above question was the first thing that ran through my mind. WHERE are they then?

is this rant over?

/rant

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:06:45 +0000

While I can’t say I was ever a Bush fan his stance on WMD is one that anyone with something to protect has to agree with. I think it was Blair who said something along the lines of: We’ve procrastinated in the past to our detriment, this time we won’t wait to find out. (my words, his sentiment)

Who can possibly argue with that?

By: Con1

Con1 — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:30:02 +0000

You’re far too sensitive. I defend Bush on these little issues – I am often making mistakes in my discussions with others…

I never said he was a simpleton, or that his butchering of the language was an embarrassment to me.

I’m not mocking him here. I’m loving him, like a relative who always says something his or her “own” way…

The man was not perfect, and his language was not either. It is one of the things that endears me to him, though.

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:49:25 +0000

Regarding the Bushisms: who hasn’t stumbled in speech, especially when it’s impromptu. “misunderestimated”: It may have been that he wanted to say “misunderstand” and “underestimate” at the same time and the word that came out was a siamese twin. That’s how spoonerisms happen. Like the old saying goes: a slip of the tongue is no fault of the mind. His mind is clean, free of any vile contamination like his cigar-twirling predecessor. I least expected,coming to your site, that I’d find repeated the liberals’ take on ‘bushisms’.

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:42:00 +0000

Tecumseh’s curse refers to every president who was elected in a year ending in 0 as the list implies, so 41 and Clinton don’t count.

By: Evan Roberts

Evan Roberts — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:05:08 +0000

Clinton and George HW Bush didn’t get shot or assassinated or anything…

By: Farewell President Bush

Farewell President Bush — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:45:07 +0000

[...] The Bush Legacy by Conservative Oasis [...]

By: Derek

Derek — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:49:46 +0000

Certainly a different look at things, which is nice.

Can’t say that I agree with you on some of the inflammatory remarks towards the left…

By: Bruce

Bruce — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:34:26 +0000

Well said!