Still Voting “Present”
What’s on my mind now, while I watch this bumbling ass of a Chicago sheister continue to talk out of both sides of his mouth is this:
Once again, the general public is missing the point about the federal challenge to Arizona’s SB 1070. And I don’t see anywhere where anyone is making the point I am going to make in a couple of minutes.
I’m not saying people are stupid. I’m simply pointing out that we all have to be very careful not to swallow the steady stream of deception that this ‘man’, this administration, is capable of feeding us.
So what is the deception about AZ’s SB 1070?
The stated position of Holder’s Selective Justice Department is twofold:
1. The States do not have the right or jurisdiction to apply their version of any type of immigration law/enforcement.
2. Doing so would distract resources and overburden the federal government’s in-place systems and policies.
That is not the real reason why Barry is going this route, but that is what you’ve been fed, along with:
1. Those who want enforcement are racists.
2. Enforcing the borders is impossible. “16 foot fences create 17 foot ladders” and other ridiculously sophomoric and idiotic ‘logic’.
Now, we all know that ultimately, this is about power and growing the democrat voting base, but still, there is a very different reason Barry has chosen to fight the AZ law…
… and that reason is, because it allows him to vote “present”. Let me explain.
In the Senate, Barry constantly voted “present” so he could remain untainted by his voting record. Barry has known for a long time his “destiny” was to be President. Voting “present” allows one to avoid actually voting on issues which could harm your political, presidential future… while making a tough decision AND actually voting one way or the other would require integrity and morals, which we all know this dipstick to be devoid of.
So you’re thinking”hey, come on. I already know that! What is your point!!!?”
Here is my point.
Barry is not fighting the AZ law because he knows in his heart that the law is wrong, or that it overreaching in scope into what is solely federal jurisdiction. He is fighting it because, if AZ starts sending scores and hundreds of illegals to I.C.E., he will be forced with what is, for him, two very undesirable choices:
1. Deport the illegals, and lose favor with illegals.
-or-
2. Openly break the law by letting them go, en masse, losing favor with the American public- and perhaps— be impeached.
Now do you see why Barry is working so hard to fight the AZ law? He knows he would be forced to make a tough decision, in what is (for him) a lose/lose situation.
Barry’s fighting the AZ law because he wants to vote “present”.
What a leader… What a ‘man’…
(Hearing that anywhere else? No, you are not. Keep coming back… You’ll often get something here you won’t get anywhere else, or I will be ahead of the media on revealing it…)
UNDERSTANDING GOVERNMENT’S THINKING
In the book “Londonistan” by Melanie Phillips, she writes: “That trend is multiculturalism, the doctrine that is now the orthodoxy throughout all the institutions of British public life. Put at its simplest, it holds that Britain is now made up of many cultures that are all equal and therefore have to be treated in an identical fashion, and that any attempt to impose the majority culture over those of minorities is by definition racist.”
And …”The expression of British majority values therefore became synonymous with racism. Multiculturalism and antiracism were now the weapons with which minorities were equipped to beat the majority. Not all minorities , mind you — Jews were not considered to be a minority because of the prevalent Marxist analysis that racism necessarily involved power, and since Jews were seen to be powerful, they were part of the majority and so could never be victims. Anyone from the third world, however, was suitably powerless and therefore their values had to trump those of the majority. And anyone who resisted that was pronounced guilty of racism or xenophobia. This was the new ‘tolerant’ society.”
Okay. Does that sound anything like what’s happening in America today? Today I’m watching Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio being harried by the Department of Justice because he is enforcing immigration law and distressing our MINORITY DEITY. This is happening even as bullets fly into Arizona from Mexico.
I was beginning to think there was something wrong with me and the idea that minorities were being catered to everywhere, but now I accept that my country is quickly going the way of the UK. As Islam creeps in, surely a minority deity favored by Obama, I wonder what’s next. I guess we can expect the antisemitism that is now a part of Britain and more minority deity thinking. Do the Jews in America see this coming or are they as lethargic and groggy as they seem to be?
I want to shake Mayor Bloomberg and say wake up, but maybe he no longer thinks of himself as a Jew or maybe he thinks his billions will make the antisemitism less cruel. Does Bloomberg see Muslims as victims and America and Israel as the oppressors?
DAISY KHAN OFFENDS
I just watched a short clip of Daisy Khan, wife of mosque-building Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, where Daisy said the opposition to the mosque in NY was “beyond Islamophobic” and antisemitic.
Sorry Daisy. I’m here to tell you you can’t play the “Poor, Poor Muslim” card. This tactic has already been explained in “Londonistan,” a book by Melanie Phillips.
Here’s what happened in Britain and what Daisy is trying to do here: “In Britain, the notion of Jewish victimhood has now been all but expunged. In its place has come ‘Islamophobia.’ While the Jews are defamed as Nazis, the Palestinians are considered to be the ‘new Jews.’ Thus have the Islamists captured the citadels of thought at the heart of the Western alliance.”
TRANSLATION: Islam wants you to think of Muslims as victims, not the Jews. Daisy has co-opted the word “antisemitism” to include Muslims. Yet, since the end of the 19th century, antisemitism has meant hatred and hostility TOWARDS JEWS exclusively. Daisy wants to replace Jewish victimhood with Islamophobia and say the Muslims are the hated ones.
No, Daisy, you can’t co-op the word antisemitism to include Muslims or play the “Poor, Poor Muslim” card here. You can yell “Islamophobic” like the deceitful person you seem to be, BUT WE’RE NOT ISLAMOPHOBIC. We just don’t want that mosque and cultural center built near ground zero.
Muslims have a history of building over conquered lands, on top of the remains of other churches, as a sign of their victory. Of course you and Imam Rauf wouldn’t do something so treacherous, and the only way to avoid the possible impropriety is to make sure no mosque is built. As a tolerant and understanding Muslim woman I’m sure you understand the continued mourning Americans devote to the men, women and children who were slaughtered so cruelly by a faction of people who use the name “Muslim.”
THE SPOTLIGHT ON ISLAM
Daisy Khan, wife of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the head of the Cordoba Initiative, is using words like \haters\ and \bigots\ and \Islamophobes\ to label those who don’t want the glorious mosque and cultural center built near ground zero in New York.
Good for Daisy. She is using methods straight from \Rules for Radicals\ to label and degrade anyone who opposes her but there is only one problem: WE’VE BEEN THERE BEFORE!
We’ve already experienced these tactics with our Illegal Alien propaganda attack and we can see through them. We know that name-calling is a tactic used by people who have little to argue. We know it is a method used to debase the opposition AND SHUT THEM UP. We know without a doubt that most of those who oppose this mosque are neither haters, nor bigots and most Americans don’t hate Muslims.
One woman marching for the mosque carried a sign asking for tolerance. She said this was an opportunity to \prove our tolerance and American values.\ Well lady, I will say to you that Americans don’t need to prove anything about religious tolerance. We’ve lived religious tolerance and our \American values\ are being subverted as I write this. The country was founded on religious freedom and we’ve lived peacefully, for the most part, with a mixture of religions willing to obey our laws. Islam is different. Islam wants its own laws and so does its representative, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf who, from everything he’s said and done, IS NO MODERATE MUSLIM.
Islam is an aggressive ideology with no tolerance and they depend on naive Americans with little knowledge of the danger to bend to their will either by misplaced compassion or by threat of violence. Dumping Muslims into this country is a lot like dumping lions in with the sheep. Get educated you lazy American before you find yourself becoming a tiptoeing submissive to a religion you are afraid to offend or even talk about.
For now, don’t let the talking heads on TV or the politicians call you names. You know you’re not a hater or a bigot so don’t let them call you one. Protest, call, write or email those who use these tactics. Stand up for yourself now.
Talking heads are a lot like \expert witnesses\ at trial. Either side can pay their expert to reach a hypothesis and often these hypotheses conflict. If your TV channel allows guests and talking heads to use Islamophobe, or bigot or hater then you know this channel has an agenda. If you hear these words consider the source. If you hear them often then tell your TV channel to hire new talking heads because you’re tired of being called names.
Get aggressive just like them because they don’t waste time. Do not give away small concessions to Islam. They will only expect more and see you as weak. THIS IS STILL YOUR COUNTRY — FOR NOW.