Obama’s Prime Time- The Best Lies Money Can Buy
Mesmerizing the Masses
Tonight, Barack Obama will become Barrage Obama, slamming the airwaves in an attempt to see how many more sheep he can mesmerize with his substance devoid platitudes and over-reaching promises that he cannot possibly actually achieve.
Why is he able to do this? One reason… because he is a finger in the wind, change my mind as needed liar.
Barack Obama made a promise: he would participate in public funding while running for President.
In November 2007, candidate and car-salesman-supreme Obama was asked the following question, “If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?” His answer? “Yes”, of course.
This is how a man- no, strike that; ‘politician’- this is how he ducks and weaves himself into a position where he can afford to hit all major networks with a half hour talking head, polished eye candy for the mindless masses who pull themselves away from their ever important sitcoms or reality TV shows long enough to make an “informed” decision on whom to vote for for President.
The cost? Approximately $1,000,000 per network.
In his 30 commercial free minutes, Obama will appeal (and he will appeal) to the mindless masses who will be swayed by slick promises which have no meaning. His stern dark eyes will cast knowing, wise-sage gazes from side to side. His perfect growling deep voice will rumble with the authority of a pastor deep in a sermon to his flock. He will sound informed, official, serious, and act as though he has the purpose of Martin Luther King himself.
Obama will spoon feed “Hope” and “Yes we can” empty ideology the mindless, undecided voter who has not been paying attention to:
- Bill Ayers
- Jeremiah Wright
- Obama’s book, several passages revealing ideology which cause concern
- Previous speeches and radio appearances, substantiating that concern
- Flip flopping on flag usage, patriotism, the back and forth use of religious references, and complaining that people in rural America “cling” to “guns and religion”
- Promising to meet unconditionally with terroristic world leaders
- and now, his apparent “toasting” his “friend”, Rashid Khalidi.
Hanging Out with the Terrorists
Khalidi is a Palestinian, as well as a professor at Columbia University. He is apparently an outspoken critic of Israel, as well as having former ties to the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization).
(Currently, approximately 74% of Jews support Obama. When in the hell will they learn?)
Anyway, I digress.
According to a written statement from McCain spokesman Michael Goldfarb- “Khalidi was a frequent dinner guest at the Obama’s home and at his farewell dinner in 2003 Obama joined the unrepentant terrorist William Ayers in giving testimonials on Khalidi’s role in the community,” “The election is one week away, and it’s unfortunate that the press so obviously favors Barack Obama that this campaign must publicly request that the Los Angeles Times do its job — make information public.”
While the Times is refusing to release the video, which allegedly shows Ayers AND Khalidi and Barack at the same event, Obama may yet get another opportunity to make news and appear on television. Allegedly, someone named Aston Grimaldi II, of Dune Capital, is offering $150,000 for a copy of the tape.
If he gets it, and I think he just might, keep your eyes peeled to see how the press handles that. I doubt they will be too terribly eager to slam their “baby”, Barack, with harsh coverage.
LOL, you must have been sleeping good. 
Thanks for including my Lions. 42 is kinda close though, can we make it a even 50? 
ROTFLMAO - "the Rosie Door", Universal Health Care for midgets...crack me up. 
Love Jindal. At least, on the surface. 
While a B Hussein win was certainly discouraging, I think we're gonna have a lot of fun and entertainment watching ...
Hmmm.
I think you have some unkind impressions of us. Perhaps from a different time.
There were 3169 active duty desertions ...
I heard this list mentioned on The Dana Show here on KFTK Radio in Saint Louis and I'm thinking this ...
Hilarious post, but sadly it's not far from the truth.
Only an angry liberal would see bitterness in it. Why are ...
Loading ...
Comment by you on 29 October 2008:
“Promising to meet unconditionally with terroristic world leaders” Unconditional meetings are not some sort of “theres only one right answer” and terroristic world leaders is bullshit.
“Flip flopping on flag usage, patriotism” You are clearly fucking retarded and biased. youre framing a little pansy fucking issue to make it seem like something that says something about his character. do YOU wear a flag lapel 24/7? I’m an American and I know that you dont need to put your hand over your heart for the national anthem because IT IS NOT A PLEDGE. Oh and what about when President Bush was photographed signing an American Flag, which is technically TREASON. not such a big deal, is it?
and Bill Ayers? what about the Keating Five? What about cheating on his car-disabled first wife? oh no, but he gave away critical information to the vietnamese and went to a navy academy where he almost failed out, so that means hes exempt from the same kind of critical bullshit you give Obama.
Suck a fat one conservatives, your rule has fucked our country over. Its our time now.
Comment by Con1 on 29 October 2008:
This is the kind of vitriol one comes to expect from the left. It is what happens when the Ritalin wears off later in the afternoon.
As for the flag lapel pin, and do I wear one? No, I do not. I am also not running to be the leader of the nation that flag represents. I am therefore also not attempting to be the commander in chief of the armed forces.
I would assume anyone who is running for President of this nation would be proud enough of out symbol to wear it in an official capacity.
Comment by Con1 on 29 October 2008:
Signing an American Flag is “treason”? What grade are you in? You’ll have to show me that statute.
Comment by A. Michael Bussek on 29 October 2008:
Much better than 74% of American Jews: The American military doesn’t trust Obama, the wannabe Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. Instead active duty members are by at least 63% for John McCain. This sends a clear signal to voters aware of it, as Barack Obama wants to pull U.S. troops out of Iraq, etc., whether they like it or not.
Even more good news: John McCain & Sarah Palin will win the U.S. presidential race when it most matters - on Election Day!
Shalom from Israel - keep up the good work!
Comment by deranger on 30 October 2008:
McCain 2000 could have won this but I’m afraid McCain 2008 is not the same man. He seems to have ditched everything that was good about him then. If he has been in charge of his own shambolic campaign then it’s difficult to see him in control of the White House. If he hasn’t been in charge then he should have been and it makes me wonder who would be in charge of the WH under his presidency. Sarah Palin has shown herself to be an effective rally speaker, stirring up and galvanising crowds and mounting attacks, but she has been pretty embarrassing in situations that require a command of facts and a deep understanding of the issues. I’m afraid she is now tainted goods. Fresh start for 2012.
Comment by Tess on 30 October 2008:
I would like to know if you obtained the sheep’s permission to label them “Barack’s targeted audience.”
Comment by Larry on 31 October 2008:
It amazes me that Barack Obama has not been seen for what he really is. He has consistently lied about his relationships with certain people and he is lying about his tax plan. If he wins and is able to get his policies implemented, the place where I work will have to lay off at least two and maybe three employees, just to be able to afford the taxes and healthcare requirements of Barack Obama. Someone needs to expain to me how that is going to help our economy.
Comment by funkydoowopper on 1 November 2008:
Larry, you really shouldn’t put so much belief in the desperate fearmongering and distortions generated by people who can’t fight this election on the issues. I really thought the days of Joe McCarthy were over long ago, if they’re not then you don’t have to look too far to see that John McCain’s associations can look pretty unsavoury too (Keating 5, Khalidi, Hagee etc etc), but I don’t believe you can judge a man simply by a few of his associations.
With regard to the tax policies, maybe your boss is trying to influence your vote by spreading that fear thing again. Don’t fall for it. Make your judgement on who can best lead and who has the best policies.