Inspector Clinton
Latest report? “Billary” Clinton’s campaign is dropping another ‘hint’.
Remember about a month ago (was it even that long?) that Hillary Clinton’s campaign leaked that it had some dirt on Osama, I mean, Obama? It did not take but a day for Obama to speak out at a High School about his past drug use. Obama clearly took Clinton and her campaign to task, and said “If ya got somethin’, let ‘er rip now!” (Paraphrasing, of course. We all know Obama is more ‘articulate’ than that.)
This, my friends, was clearly a “get ahead of the story” reaction on Obama’s part. This is always the smart move when you have something that you would have liked to hide, but have to admit because you think someone else will beat you over the head with it.
Since Clinton and her campaign were called to task on that implication of “dirt”, they clearly needed another tactic.
Well, here we have it again. A top Clinton advisor (Bill Shaheen) has made a comment that much of Obama’s past (apparently he meant drug use) is not known, and that Republicans would dig hard into that past. Who knows, he implies, what they might find.
Mark my words- the Clintons, being masters of deceit and media control and leaks (just like many Democrats in the House and Senate), are essentially dropping a “cover” story to create the lead in to the leak they will likely provide later about Obama, on their own.
This may or may not become necessary. It all depends on how Obama does. If he does well, expect the “leak” to emerge, and expect it to then be tied to the “Republican politics of personal destruction” machine.
Clinton’s campaign is trying to distance itself from the comment by Shaheen. It is amazing how often deceitful people use surrogates and then claim in their best Sgt. Shultz voice “I know NUT-TING!”.
That is about as close as I will normally get to the word “conspiracy”. But considering I am talking about the Clinton’s and their political machinery, I don’t think it is much of a stretch to see that writing on the wall.
